Quote:
Originally Posted by echoscot
Seriously, I think it is a great idea to have unique attractions for each park, but keep in mind many things have gone to both parks and it turned out not to be too bad. Part of the mystique of Disney parks is originality so that when attractions moved into different parks, there was also a slight or major modification.
It gets tough to figure out though, because it is easy to let sentiment affect our thinking. We like things the way they are and don't want them to change, and yet change has happened, sometimes for the good, sometimes for the bad.
|
I absolutely aggree with the first part of your posting,
not too much with the second part... but in THIS sense: it was better that Disney
NEVER, NEVER had copied his
LAND into another park. :)
WDW Magic Kingdom would have been a 100% unique vacation destination for West-coasters, and DL Anaheim would have been same for East-coasters... NOW, it is just a would-be destination for both.
-------------
Just an idea for "Kilimanjaro Safaris"... Why not introducing an absurd-humour element there: an icy IGLOO village, surrounded by some Iceberg's...

(....... I know this is not in Epcot, but I don't see that kind of joke in Epcot...)