Visions Fantastic - View Single Post

Where'sYourLaughinPlace? · 12-04-2005, 10:23 AM

Yeah, hence why Uncle Remus is allowed to leave the plantation freely. BUT, in the 1940's, the NAACP said that Disney was "sugar coating" slavery and that they portrayed an "idyllic master-slave relationship". But I have heard that currently the NAACP has no position on the film. And there were no complaints when Song of the South was re-released back in '86. And I have also heard from a web-site that Song of the South will become public domain in 2039.

AGAIN! If you want to know about all this stuff PM me and I will send you a link to a Song of the South web-site that has A LOT of info on the movie and stuff!

12-04-2005, 10:23 AM	#12 (permalink)
Where'sYourLaughinPlace? Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Chandler, AZ Posts: 160 My Mood:	Yeah, hence why Uncle Remus is allowed to leave the plantation freely. BUT, in the 1940's, the NAACP said that Disney was "sugar coating" slavery and that they portrayed an "idyllic master-slave relationship". But I have heard that currently the NAACP has no position on the film. And there were no complaints when Song of the South was re-released back in '86. And I have also heard from a web-site that Song of the South will become public domain in 2039. AGAIN! If you want to know about all this stuff PM me and I will send you a link to a Song of the South web-site that has A LOT of info on the movie and stuff! __________________ So, YOU'RE lookin for a laughin place, eh?? WE'LL show YOU a LAUGHIN PLACE! Premium AP holder I bleed Maroon and Gold! Proud Sun Devil!!! ASU > NAU My Countdown Counting down to: First Disneyland trip of 2008 I am in Disneyland!!! Last edited by Where'sYourLaughinPlace?; 12-04-2005 at 10:31 AM.